一个不信的人能领受圣餐吗?

Roe 不再支持了

 

No More Roe (vs. Wade) English English

在尽 管她在七年前背弃了自己关于堕胎的观点,但很少有人知道这个“Jane Roe”其实是 Norman McCorvey曾在臭名昭著的 Roe v.Wade案件中作为主要起诉人所使用的化名, 而(现在)不再支持堕胎了。 事实上,她如今坚决反对对无辜婴儿的屠杀行为。 2002年的 5月,在离开我们护教学出版社办公室在仅二十分钟的的地方,McCorvey女士在 350人面前诉说了转变的故事。McCorvey告诉她的听者,在支持了长达二十多年的主张堕胎运动后,她最终发现她的所主张的东西是错误的。这其中发生 了什么呢? McCorvey坦言那“压垮骆驼的麦秆”出现在一家堕胎诊所中,当时她就在那儿工作,并被要求进入一个存放婴儿尸体的房间。 她的工作就是清点婴儿的肢体碎块,确保医生已经从母体中取出了所有身体部分。 曾在至少四家堕胎证所工作的 McCorvey说道,“我回到存放肢体的房间,我看着这些极小的婴儿,我变得失常了(正如在 2002年的 McGrew中的引用) 一个主张妇女堕胎权利的妇女如今视堕胎为十恶不赦之罪,那罪就是流无辜人血。(箴言6:17) 她现在认识到从一个母亲的子宫内撕扯下一个婴孩是多么残忍的一件事,确切地说是将孩子撕成“碎片”。 McCorvey不仅看到了她看待这件事上的错误,还开始花费大量时间来帮助妇女保全他们的孩子,而不是鼓励他们扼杀掉它们(“简是谁,”1998)。 我相信,如果更多的支持堕胎主义者能够亲身看到 Norma McCorvey所看到的直观体验,他们也同样会“改变立场”。 如果“Jane Roe,”曾经是一个倡导堕胎的发言人的话,而今却从她的错误中转变过来,那么毋庸置疑的是各位代表们和最高法庭的公正一定也能做出相同的判断。 让我们来为这件事向全能的神祷告,鼓励我们的政府官员持守人的生命避免有朝一日重蹈 1973年Roe v.Wade案件中的错误判决。

No More Roe (vs. Wade)

Although she recanted her views about abortion seven years ago, relatively few people know that “Jane Roe,” the pseudonym that Norma McCorvey assumed as the lead plaintiff in the infamous Roe v. Wade case, no longer supports abortion. In fact, she now adamantly opposes the slaughtering of innocent babies. In May 2002, just twenty minutes from our offices at Apologetics Press, Ms. McCorvey told of her “conversion” story before a crowd of 350 people. McCorvey informed her listeners that after over twenty years of supporting the pro-abortion platform, she finally saw the error of her ways. What did it take? McCorvey indicated that the “straw that broke the camel’s back” came while she was working in an abortion clinic and instructed to enter a room where aborted fetuses were kept. Her assignment was to count the body parts of an infant that had just been aborted—to make sure the doctor had retrieved the entire baby from the mother’s womb. McCorvey, who had worked in at least four abortion clinics, stated, “I went back to the parts room, and I looked at this tiny little infant, and I freaked” (as quoted in McGrew, 2002).

The woman who symbolized a woman’s right to have an abortion now sees abortion for the heinous sin that really is—the sacrifice of innocent blood (cf. Proverbs 6:17). She now understands how barbaric it is to tear an infant from his mother’s womb, literally shredding the child into “parts.” McCorvey not only has seen the error of her ways, but she currently spends much of her time helping women save babies, rather than encouraging them to slaughter them (“Who is Jane,” 1998). I believe that if more pro-abortionists would allow themselves to see what Norma McCorvey saw firsthand, they would “swap sides” as well.

If “Jane Roe,” the onetime leading spokeswoman for abortion, could change the error of her ways, then undoubtedly our elected representatives and Supreme Court Justices could do the same. Let us pray to the Almighty regarding this matter, and encourage our government officials to uphold the value of human life by one day reversing the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.

References

Original article: “No More Roe,” Eric Lyons, www.apologeticspress.org

McGrew, Jannel (2002), “ ‘Jane Roe’ Tells Story of Change at Fund-raiser,” Prattville Progress, May 1.

“Who is ‘Jane Roe’?” (1998), [On-line], URL: http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1998/roe.wade/stories/.

 

 

 

为什么不看一下:
  How can I be united with Jesus? Get free Flash player Needs Flash Player

up